My first year in San Francisco I must have attended 200 readings and missed many I wished I had got to (you could find a poetry reading everyday of the week in the 1980s). Yet by 1990, when I started teaching high school English full-time, the number of readings I attended had dwindled to a dozen per year, half of which I organized or featured me as a reader.
That lamentable dearth of attendance at poetry readings (the life-blood, the connective tissue, of my development as a writer) continues (how many readings have you been to in the last year?), but there may be a good valid reason for the decline: The rhetoric of the poetry reading is predictable, enervating: Poet providing an explanation to the poems that often proves to be more interesting than the poems themselves, an unstructured reading (let’s read the poems that have gotten positive response rather than building a reading so that the reading itself is a viable, collective text), any energy acquired in a poem’s reading dissipating before the next poem begins. A poetry reading requires planning, attention to the timing and spacing/space within which each poem is uttered/performed, yet readings have been dumbed-down to the formulaic.
I haven’t attended many readings other than my own the past few years. The last one that stands out is a reading by Jonathan Brannen in Portland’s Spare Room series. One perk to my new university post at WSU, finally unavalanched by student papers, is open evenings to attend the English department’s reading series.
Rick Barot visited WSU last Thursday. The bulk of his reading fit the rhetorical frame I touch on above, yet his work broke out of the mold with a striking collage piece, “Exegesis,” a blending of a close reading of one sentence from Hemingways’ A Farewell to Arms and a blog by a soldier in Iraq
about birdwatching. He had no witty explanation of the poem; he was almost embarassed about reading it (a war poem, many of which he had discarded).
When I asked him if he had other poems like that, Barot was almost apologetic. What I hoped to say to him in asking was that what he was most uncertain about–poems such as “Exegesis”– he should be most certain about. Time to mine that creative vein and eschew the explanations.