pulling his mouth into a frown. Serious pouches hung beneath his eyes
That’s his job, and so he takes his boos and exits
the stage, and no one really thinks about it much again
Opening the growing, seasoning the reasoning.
He yearns for her yarns while she knits.
Who’s left, then, when everyone’s right in the ground?
I had a feeling that I shouldn’t be here listening to this
sinful man who had mixed children and didn’t care who knew
it, but he was fascinating. I had never encountered a being
who deliberately perpetrated fraud against himself. But why
Difference of opinion, approach, which they have brushed aside before.
It’s difficult to pretend it’s not there. It would have been a lot worse.
Foiled the intruders? The only way to prepare is to avoid
flames thrown off by the pilot, good faith, verifiable coercive options.
How much time do we have? It becomes irretrievable
What can brown do for you? Less than Jimmy Kimmel, more
than Madeline Albright. There’s an odd sensation moving through
my body. I’m invoking a supreme directive. God has said
prepare for the enemies of god. It’s the first place we
begin to age. I was nots thinking I could ever break into
that world. You’re going to have to run me down
Doubt = distance, a stance that dies. This is the last day
of the poem, if not the last day of poems (or the last
poem of days). Every moment pregnant with the next
fertilizing other pregnancies, yet, moments with children
bulge with interruptions. What you do in the near future
will be suspect, pecking away at my sustenance, my hope
in your inherent integrity. Where’s the escape
I was asked recently to explain these poems (from 7 x 7, Otoliths 2010). I've done so in an interview with Jeff Hansen:
http://experimentalfictionpoetry.blogspot.com/2010/07/interview-with-poet-crag-hill-on-his.html
Hansen: All the poems in 7x7 take their name from a card from a standard playing deck. How does this randomness fit with the formal discontinuities in other parts of the poems?
Hill: I cannot recall if I chose playing cards to title the poems before or after other aspects of the project in place (ultimately each title corresponded to the card I slid from the diminishing deck). One of the 7s in 7 x 7 represents the number of days in a week. Thus the first day of the week has one line, the second day two lines, etc. (I have used the seven days of the week before-see The Week, The Runaway Spoon Press, 1991-to structure a writing project). The other 7 denotes the number of different sources I worked with to write the content of each stanza. I used seven playing cards to select each source for the day. If I pulled an Ace from the short stack, I selected from poetry in my notebook. For a 2, I selected prose from my notebook. With a 3, I chose a quote from a book I was reading. With a 4, I rewrote a passage from a book I was reading, changing the sense while retaining as much of the sound as I could. Drawing a 5, I quoted news from the internet or magazines (primarily Newsweek). With a 6, I quoted from a newspaper (most commonly The Moscow-Pullman Daily News, circulation 8000). Pulling out a 7, I quoted-or slightly misquoted/misheard-television and radio programs. For instance, in "Queen of Hearts," the first line is a taken from a prose passage in my notebook about Ken Kesey's Sometimes a Great Notion. The next two lines are quotations from a political news show. The next three lines are a rewriting of a passage from something I was reading (I didn't keep a record of these texts). The next four lines are a poetry excerpt taken from my notebook, a poem written on a drive across Montana to visit family in Wisconsin. For the next five lines I again drew an Ace and excerpted from a poem based on a dream. The last two stanzas are direct quotations from my reading (direct quotations of text are marked by italics).